loader

Data

img images SUDAN

Debt History

Sudan’s public debt to GDP ratio stood at its peak at 455% in 1992 but decreased to 75% in 2015. The reasons reflect a combination of internal and external factors. First, Sudan had suffered from economic underdevelopment in the 1970s and 1980s due to two civil wars. Poor economic performance along with political instability and reliance on foreign aid and finance caused an imbalance of trade and a decrease in revenue, which led to a huge accumulation of debt servicing arrears, making the county heavily indebted in the 1990s. Second, Sudan could hardly access international financial system due to the U.S. sanctions in 1997. The sanctions included a trade embargo, freezing of government assets and limits on the country to transact in US dollars. Therefore, multilateral institutions did not provide debt relief or debt rescheduling programs for Sudan. The failure to repay total debt service made Sudan borrow more to service its debt payments resulting in a growing spiral of indebtedness. However, China provided some relief over the 2000-2018 period, on four different occasions, most recently in 2018.

Key Projections for 2021

0.8%

Economic Growth

2 / 8

DR's Debt Transparency Index

75%

Public debt to GDP ratio

-4.3%

Budget balance

Sudan

Debt to GDP Ratio

In the past few years, Sudan’s debt level has remained high. Its general governmental debt accounted for around 202% of GDP in 2019. Major challenges include the shrinking economy, high inflation, overvalued currency, and large fiscal deficits. Due to a weak business environment and social turmoil, economic growth contracted in 2018 and 2019, by an estimated 2.3% and 2.5%, respectively. The fiscal deficit has widened from 3.8% in 2015 to 10.8% in 2019, making the county more vulnerable to service its debt payments. Moreover, until late 2020 Sudan remained on the US State Sponsor of Terrorism list, which continued to exclude the country from being part of the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HPIC) debt relief programme.

Furthermore, Sudan scored joint bottom in the Debt Transparency Index, with no effective data portal provided by government, nor a debt management office or a public medium-term debt strategy, though it passed a Freedom of Information Law in 2015.

Sudan

Revenue and Budget Balance

Report

Projected debt service to China vs Other creditors

Chinese debt represents a substantial share of Sudan’s external debt stocks and has increased from US$174.1 million in 2002 to US$4.4 billion in 2017, now accounting for 20% of Sudan’s total external debt stocks. This is partly because other donors are inactive in Sudan, due to sanctions from the US. For example, until 2020 Sudan was unable to get concessional loans from the World Bank due to protracted non-accrual status. However, China makes its own assessment. Thus, China Africa Research Initiative recorded that there are at least 68 Chinese loan projects in Sudan, varying from power stations, transport, the agriculture sector, as well as loans for military equipment. The total Chinese loans to Sudan during the period of 2000-2018 values at US$6.81 billion based on CARI’s figure, though this may be a conservative estimate.

img

In order to get access to finance, given a very low asset base, Sudan used flows of its resources such as oil and gold to provide collateral to be able to get loans from China – known as Resource Based Loans (RBLs). Such resource-backed loans (RBLs) provided a clear benefit to Sudan’s citizens in the sense of ensuring oil revenues were fully dedicated (i.e. hypothecated) to infrastructure spending projects and ensuring less chances for funds to be lost to tax havens, for instance.  In addition, in some cases, if well negotiated, such instruments can be designed to provide a buffer for borrowers against low oil (or other natural resource) prices, an issue that become pertinent in 2020 when oil prices plummeted.

On the other hand, there are potential opportunity costs associated with RBLs:  Sudanese citizens may have preferred oil revenues to be spent on other issues such as education or health. In addition, such instruments do not eliminate the potential of overinflated project bids, which can be associated with corruption. Finally, if not well negotiated RBLs could still leave Sudan vulnerable to oil price fluctuations, especially unprecedented price shocks. For instance, if debt obligations and loan repayments are linked to a fixed price that has meant as the price falls, Sudan would be obliged to export larger quantities of resources to China to service its debt. However, it is not clear how Sudan has negotiated these RBLs with China, and with the independence of South Sudan obviously these loans are more limited.  For example, in 2013, Sudan took a US$1.5 billion loan with a five-year grace period from China. In 2018, China agreed to provide Sudan US$58 million grants and US$30 million interest-free loan for peace security and the economic development during the China-Africa Cooperation Forum.

China Debt : GDP Ratio (%)

External Debt Stock to China vs. Other Countries (USD millions)

The arrears of debt service limits financing from the IMF, the World Bank, and the African Development Bank, make it extremely hard for Sudan to manage debt or invest in economic development and poverty reduction.   At the same time, Sudan likely needs significant infrastructure finance to meet outstanding basic needs of the population and to cut poverty. Access to internet and electricity is particularly behind, and road infrastructure is currently very limited.

However, with already “high” levels of public debt it is unclear how this could be provided internally or even externally. According to the IMF, Sudan is IN debt distress, with the Jubilee debt campaign predicting a debt crisis in 2020, highlighting vulnerabilities in Sudan’s ability to fulfil debt obligations.

External Debt

img
img

Acknowledgements:

WRITERS   Joe Peissel and Yike Fu   GRAPHIC DESIGNER  Kayode Animashaun
and The Development Reimagined Team

Statement on use of data:

This debt guide uses a compilation of data from the IMF World Economic Outlook, the World Bank, the AfDB, Trading Economics, Jubilee Debt Campaign, China Africa Research Initiative for Chinese loans, Christoph Trebesch et al. for China Debt Stock Database, DR’s dataset for debt cancellation and COVID spending, as well as the data from countries’ government websites (if applicable).
Plan

Health and Well being choices

55%

Listening Music

47%

Reading

36%

Gardening

25%

Sleeping

img

60%

Watching Tv

19%

Meditation

Protect

People are doing to support their fitness

During the month of January, health and fitness is top of mind for people setting resolutions for a healthy new year. Google searches for fitness peak at the beginning of the year and according to data from the International Health, Racquet, and Sportsclub Association (IHRSA), 10.8 percent of all health club members join their gyms in January.

38 %

Home Workout

9 %

Buy Equipment

7 %

Fitness App
img
Work

People plan to do at work when
restictions are lifted

40%

Avoid Handshackes and Hug

31%

Limited time spent in mettings

29%

Plan to work more from home

29%

Limite time in public places

33%

Limit visite to supermarket

30%

Do more Online Shopping

Cases

Covid-19 Cases

It is a long established fact that a reader will be distracted by the readable content of a page when looking at its layout.

COVID-19

Month on Month

Global Corona virus Impact and Implications

COVID-19 cases crossed the 15-million mark globally this week, with South Africa replacing Peru among the top five worst affected countries.

  • US
  • Brazil
  • India
  • Russia
  • South Africa
  • Peru
Health

Countries Spend On Their Health Systems

Asia

Africa

America

Europe

en_GBEnglish (UK)